ADS

» » Cgst Circulars No. 89 To 91 Dated 18Th February 2019

Cgst Circulars No. 89 To 91 Dated 18Th February 2019

Edit
that the majority of tax payers are not reporting details in Table CGST Circulars No. 89 to 91 dated 18th February 2019


As per CGST Circulars released on 18th Feb. 2019 it has come to notice  that the majority of tax payers are not reporting details in Table 3.2 of GSTR-3B, the circular has been issued  to clarify that the tax payers has to fill the details of supplies to unregistered dealers mandatorily in table 3.2 of GSTR-3B and also in table 7B of GSTR-1.
  •  It is mentioned that such disclosure is essential for distributing the funds to respective states.
  •  It is also clarified that the non-compliance would lead to levy of penalties u/s 125 of the act.

II. Circular No. 90/09/2019-GST dated 18.02.2019

  •  After observing that few of the tax payers (majority of banking, insurance and telecom sectors) are not specifying the Place of supply (POS) for the IGST invoices in accordance with Rule 46(n), the circular has been issued to clarify that the POS and name of the state as a mandate.
  • It is also clarified that the non-compliance would lead to levy of penalties u/s 122 or 125 of the act.

III. Circular No. 91/10/2019-GST dated 18.02.2019

  •   In Circular 46/2017 Customs Dated 24.Nov.17, it was clarified that,
  • “IGST” shall be paid on supplies made during the period for which the goods are in customs bonded ware house and
  • “Customs+IGST” shall be paid at the time of removal from customs bonded warehouse.
  • In Circular 3/2018 IGST Dated 25th May, 18, it was clarified that, considering the amendments in the Customs Tariff act,
  • There shall not be any tax required to be paid on supplies made during the period for which the goods are in customs bonded ware house and
  • “Customs+IGST” shall be paid at the time of removal from customs bonded warehouse
  • This shall be applicable w.e.f. 01.Apr.18.
  • Further, the department has noticed that, from Jul’17-Mar’18,
  • Many assesses considered supplies made during the period for which the goods are in customs bonded ware house as Intra state and
  • There was no provision in GSTR-1 for changing POS for such B2B supplies. If the supplier and recipient are in same state, it was considered as Intra-state sales.
  •  Therefore, the department hereby clarified that, such errors if any, made during the period Jul’17-Mar’18 shall be condoned and considered as proper compliance of the law.
  • It would also imply that, if any person missed to pay tax on such supplies, same shall be paid.

Subscribe to receive free email updates:

ADS